Herman Daly, an ecological economist, provides a nice
explanation for what is wrong with our current economic system in the essay
“Economics for a full world”. Daily’s essay explains how our
current economic model was designed from the vantage point of the world being
mostly empty (of humans and their impacts). Economic growth has gotten us
to a place of fullness, and it may be time to change our economic models to
become more in line with the real world, while we still can.
The introduction to the essay states:
Because of the exponential
economic growth since World War II, we now live in a full world, but we still
behave as if it were empty, with ample space and resources for the indefinite
future. The founding assumptions of neoclassical economics, developed in the
empty world, no longer hold, as the aggregate burden of the human species is
reaching—or, in some cases, exceeding—the limits of nature at the local,
regional, and planetary levels. The prevailing obsession with economic growth
puts us on the path to ecological collapse, sacrificing the very sustenance of
our well-being and survival. To reverse this ominous trajectory, we must
transition toward a steady-state economy focused on qualitative development, as
opposed to quantitative growth, and the interdependence of the human economy
and global ecosphere. Developing policies and institutions for a steady-state
economy will require us to revisit the question of the purpose and ends of the
economy.
Read the entire essay at the following link for more insights
on the inherent problems with the current economic model and some suggestions
for a revised more realistic model. http://www.greattransition.org/publication/economics-for-a-full-world
No comments:
Post a Comment