As Bob pointed out at our last meeting, the world’s heads of state are heading to New York this week
to attend the UN’s Sustainable Development Summit. Part of the summit
will be the signing off on the Sustainable Development Goals that are hoped to
be achieved within 15 years. These laudable goals include 17 topics that
include the likes of: ( https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics
)
1.
End poverty in all its forms everwhere
2.
End hunger, achieve food security and
improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
3.
Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being
for all at all ages
4.
Ensure inclusive and equitable quality
education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
5.
Achieve gender equality and empower all
women and girls
6.
Ensure availability and sustainable
management of water and sanitation for all
7.
Ensure access to affordable, reliable,
sustainable and modern energy for all
8.
Promote sustained, inclusive and
sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for
all
9.
Build resilient infrastructure, promote
inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
10.
Reduce inequality within and among
countries
11.
Make cities and human settlements
inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
12.
Ensure sustainable consumption and
production patterns
13.
Take urgent action to combat climate
change and its impacts*
14.
Conserve and sustainably use the oceans,
seas and marine resources for sustainable development
15.
Protect, restore and promote sustainable
use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat
desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity
loss
16.
Promote peaceful and inclusive societies
for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build
effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
17.
Strengthen the means of implementation
and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development
On
the surface, these all seem like good goals to strive for. But as
anthropologist Jason Hickel points out in his recent Guardian piece titled
“Forget 'developing' poor countries, it's time to 'de-develop' rich countries”
(http://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2015/sep/23/developing-poor-countries-de-develop-rich-countries-sdgs?CMP=share_btn_tw
), a continued focus on growth, as highlighted in goal 8, is likely to get us
to the same place our current growth has, which is an increase in the problems
the goals are trying to eliminate.
Per
Hickel –
The main strategy for eradicating
poverty is the same: growth.
It will take 100 years for the world’s
poorest people to earn $1.25 a day
Growth has been the main object of
development for the past 70 years, despite the fact that it’s not working.
Since 1980, the global economy has grown by 380%, but the number of people
living in poverty on less than $5 (£3.20) a day has increased by more than 1.1
billion. That’s 17 times the population of Britain. So much for the
trickle-down effect.
Orthodox economists insist that all we
need is yet more growth. More progressive types tell us that we need to shift
some of the yields of growth from the richer segments of the population to the
poorer ones, evening things out a bit. Neither approach is adequate. Why?
Because even at current levels of average global consumption, we’re
overshooting our planet’s bio-capacity by more than 50% each year.
In other words, growth isn’t an option
any more – we’ve already grown too much. Scientists are now telling us that
we’re blowing past planetary boundaries at breakneck speed. And the hard truth
is that this global crisis is due almost entirely to overconsumption in rich
countries.
Either we slow down voluntarily or
climate change will do it for us. We can’t go on ignoring the laws of nature.
But rethinking our theory of progress is not only an ecological imperative, but
also a development one. If we do not act soon, all our hard-won gains against
poverty will evaporate, as food systems collapse and mass famine re-emerges to
an extent not seen since the 19th century.
This is not about giving anything up.
And it’s certainly not about living a life of voluntary misery or imposing
harsh limits on human potential. On the contrary, it’s about reaching a higher
level of understanding and consciousness about what we’re doing here and why.
So
what do you think - can we keep on growing and eventually outgrow our
problems? Or is it time for us to grow up and learn how to live a
meaningful life on our finite planet?
No comments:
Post a Comment